<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Logic High Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.logichigh.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.logichigh.com</link>
	<description>Logic High Software Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UIImage fix by xun</title>
		<link>http://blog.logichigh.com/2008/06/05/uiimage-fix/comment-page-2/#comment-1488</link>
		<dc:creator>xun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 09:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badpirate.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-1488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool! Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool! Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Peak Oil Doomsday&#8230; Apocolypse no? by badpirate</title>
		<link>http://blog.logichigh.com/2008/06/17/peak-oil-doomsday-apocolypse-no/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>badpirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badpirate.wordpress.com/?p=61#comment-1478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[J Lee - Not given up.  We are making many more strides in the right direction.  Technology moves pretty quickly.  Solar and Battery (Lithium-whatever) technology seems to have taken a lead at the moment, but I&#039;m not really sure if the rare earth minerals required for their production are as sustainable as we&#039;d like.  I think that many environmentalists were pacified by Obama taking office (Right around the time I was making this post originally), in hopes that he would have a more progressive energy policy then his predecessor.... and we were right ($90 billion for green energy).  But the problem is not gone yet for sure.

I&#039;m not the woman in the video, but her video stirred me into some momentary activism.  And at the very least, I added to the noise of people demanding change on the subject.  And will continue to do so as needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J Lee &#8211; Not given up.  We are making many more strides in the right direction.  Technology moves pretty quickly.  Solar and Battery (Lithium-whatever) technology seems to have taken a lead at the moment, but I&#8217;m not really sure if the rare earth minerals required for their production are as sustainable as we&#8217;d like.  I think that many environmentalists were pacified by Obama taking office (Right around the time I was making this post originally), in hopes that he would have a more progressive energy policy then his predecessor&#8230;. and we were right ($90 billion for green energy).  But the problem is not gone yet for sure.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the woman in the video, but her video stirred me into some momentary activism.  And at the very least, I added to the noise of people demanding change on the subject.  And will continue to do so as needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Validating an e-mail address by Danny</title>
		<link>http://blog.logichigh.com/2010/09/02/validating-an-e-mail-address/comment-page-1/#comment-1468</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 21:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logichigh.com/?p=231#comment-1468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider this my +1 to you since you don&#039;t have a G+ button with which I could otherwise commend you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider this my +1 to you since you don&#8217;t have a G+ button with which I could otherwise commend you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UIImage fix by Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.logichigh.com/2008/06/05/uiimage-fix/comment-page-2/#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badpirate.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-1467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, obviously, the EXIF data (eg reorientation) should not be applied to the image data. I&#039;m also using a non-lazy loading image method (via an UIImage category) that ignores the orientation and the other meta data...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, obviously, the EXIF data (eg reorientation) should not be applied to the image data. I&#8217;m also using a non-lazy loading image method (via an UIImage category) that ignores the orientation and the other meta data&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UIImage fix by Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.logichigh.com/2008/06/05/uiimage-fix/comment-page-1/#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 07:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://badpirate.wordpress.com/?p=49#comment-1466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good job!
I&#039;m using this code to get the image data:

NSData *imageData = [AVCaptureStillImageOutput jpegStillImageNSDataRepresentation:imageSampleBuffer];
UIImage *image = [[UIImage alloc] initWithData:imageData];
self.stillImage = [self scaleAndRotateImage:image];

I find it really interesting that the EXIF information is stored unused in the UIImage (as I understand):

UIImageOrientation orient = image.imageOrientation;
switch(orient) {

How can I know if the reorientation is already applied to the image data or not?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job!<br />
I&#8217;m using this code to get the image data:</p>
<p>NSData *imageData = [AVCaptureStillImageOutput jpegStillImageNSDataRepresentation:imageSampleBuffer];<br />
UIImage *image = [[UIImage alloc] initWithData:imageData];<br />
self.stillImage = [self scaleAndRotateImage:image];</p>
<p>I find it really interesting that the EXIF information is stored unused in the UIImage (as I understand):</p>
<p>UIImageOrientation orient = image.imageOrientation;<br />
switch(orient) {</p>
<p>How can I know if the reorientation is already applied to the image data or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When does layoutSubviews get called? by UIView? ??/?? ?? ?? ? layoutSubviews ??? ?? ?? &#171; Park&#039;s Park</title>
		<link>http://blog.logichigh.com/2011/03/16/when-does-layoutsubviews-get-called/comment-page-1/#comment-1408</link>
		<dc:creator>UIView? ??/?? ?? ?? ? layoutSubviews ??? ?? ?? &#171; Park&#039;s Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logichigh.com/?p=243#comment-1408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ??? layoutSubviews ? ?? ????? ??? ?????. (?? :  when does layoutSubviews get called  ) &lt; from Logic High Blog [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ??? layoutSubviews ? ?? ????? ??? ?????. (?? :  when does layoutSubviews get called  ) &lt; from Logic High Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When does layoutSubviews get called? by UIView? ??/?? ?? ?? ? layoutSubviews ??? ?? ?? &#171; Park&#039;s Park</title>
		<link>http://blog.logichigh.com/2011/03/16/when-does-layoutsubviews-get-called/comment-page-1/#comment-1407</link>
		<dc:creator>UIView? ??/?? ?? ?? ? layoutSubviews ??? ?? ?? &#171; Park&#039;s Park</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 18:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logichigh.com/?p=243#comment-1407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] ??? layoutSubviews ? ?? ????? ??? ?????. (?? :  when does layoutSubviews get called  ) &lt; from Logic High Blog [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ??? layoutSubviews ? ?? ????? ??? ?????. (?? :  when does layoutSubviews get called  ) &lt; from Logic High Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by badpirate</title>
		<link>http://blog.logichigh.com/about-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator>badpirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 18:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logichigh.com/?page_id=75#comment-1355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry… It never panned out.  I pitched the idea to the other party and the decided to just go with posting the source as a new application (screw the customers).  Meh.  I think it would work though :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry… It never panned out.  I pitched the idea to the other party and the decided to just go with posting the source as a new application (screw the customers).  Meh.  I think it would work though <img src='http://blog.logichigh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Diego</title>
		<link>http://blog.logichigh.com/about-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1354</link>
		<dc:creator>Diego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logichigh.com/?page_id=75#comment-1354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Kevin,

Regarding what you said at the end of: http://stackoverflow.com/a/6024688/997905  what was the result? did Apple finally approved the app update?  The curiosity is killing me :D

Thanks, have a nice day!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin,</p>
<p>Regarding what you said at the end of: <a href="http://stackoverflow.com/a/6024688/997905" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/a/6024688/997905</a>  what was the result? did Apple finally approved the app update?  The curiosity is killing me <img src='http://blog.logichigh.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Thanks, have a nice day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Validating an e-mail address by Julian</title>
		<link>http://blog.logichigh.com/2010/09/02/validating-an-e-mail-address/comment-page-1/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.logichigh.com/?p=231#comment-1339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#039;lax&#039; checker could be written as

    ^.+@.+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8216;lax&#8217; checker could be written as</p>
<p>    ^.+@.+\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
